Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog |
|
| Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 2:08 PM GMT on August 24, 2009 | +3 |


| Permalink | A A A |
|
|
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.
|
Tropical Blogs
Tropical Weather Stickers®
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 — Blog Index
No, he likely meant the east coast.
he said Florida northward should monitor the progression of this system.
I am leaning with the ECMWF in the system missing the first weakness and bringing it into the western Bahamas. A lot of this looks like timing issue too. When the upper level trough splits and an upper level cyclone forms and moves into the GOM and begins to advect eastward.
Long term /Wednesday through Monday/...
the period will start off with a closed off upper low over the Gulf
states...generally zonal upper flow well north of the area from the
Great Lakes region to New England. A weakening deep layer ridge will
be over the east central Atlantic waters. The big question for at
least the first part of the extended period will be the potential
for the development of a tropical system somewhere north-northeast of the
Bahamas and south of 30 degree north latitude by Thursday. The models are
not in very good agreement on the development...timing...or
placement of this potential system. The GFS seems to be the weakest
and furthest east with this system...keeping it well east of our
region...while the European model (ecmwf) and NAM seem to be indicating the potential
for the developing low center to move farther west...closer to the
southeast U.S. Coast. Given the large uncertainty with the potential
evolution of this system....stay tuned to the latest forecasts and
discussions from the National Hurricane Center and our office.
Overall...made very little change to the previous forecast. Deep
layer moisture increases to near 2 inches by Wednesday...and sticks
around through about Saturday. The closed upper low is still shown
to begin ejecting NE toward the area on Thursday...then move across
the region Friday and into early Saturday. The latest guidance
continues to show higher probability of precipitation for the Thursday and Friday
periods...and have nudged forecast probability of precipitation up a tad for these time
frames. Think given the available moisture and lift from the upper
trough...we should see at least chance/scattered mainly afternoon
convection. However...this scenario hinges on the idea that the
developing Atlantic tropical low mentioned above stays well east of
the region. Previous model forecasts even suggested that the region
would actually remain rather dry through this week as the moisture
with the tropical low remained well east and the lift/moisture with
the upper low stayed just west of the forecast area. Confidence on
this solution is beginning to fall rapidly...and have therefore
begun to trend probability of precipitation up slightly for at least Thursday and Friday.
Models are now showing the potential for a decent frontal passage by
the end of the period. The GFS is showing a cold front moving
through on Monday...while the European model (ecmwf) is slower...showing a front on
Tuesday. Too early yet to have much confidence on this feature...and
have therefore maintained slt chance to chance diurnal probability of precipitation for
Monday.
Just the east coast of Florida has a chance at being affected. The model unanimously agree on a cut-off mid to upper level cyclone in the GOM. The timing of this and the storm's relative position are the problem.
possible so you think the next run the models will agree with the model 456 posted above
Yeah really... I think it is rogue reporting that is doing us all in.
yes
GFDL
Time to write a letter! LOL!
Current activity is still near-below average.
The NHC used to determine maximum winds by the latter classification: what would the maximum winds be if the storm was stationary.
However, currently the NHC lists any 1-min maximum substained wind, irrespective of any movement, as its maximum wind.
Not sure when this was changed however.
Like a rogue elephant, like a scoundrel, or other dishonest person
Baha I need your thoughts please....
BBL. Keep an eye on 92L for me....
...so...Cat 5...and Charleston is obliterated?
looks good on ya...
Depending on timing, 92L may get pulled up as the high moves through and out. Too early to tell of course. This is going to be an interesting Aug/Sept/Oct.
Need to go finish dinner. I'll be in and out lurking.
Time to dig a hole and hunker down PRESS....LOL
not just charleston, the whole CAROLINAS
it seems you are correct
-CanesRule1.
Viewing: 851 - 901
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 — Blog Index